Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.
UWF Libraries logo
Your opinion counts! Please give us feedback.

ANT 4532/ANG 5408: Disease and Culture

Assignment

For the final paper, you will write a critical review of key literature on a topic of interest (related to health, broadly defined) using an anthropological frame/perspective. The literature review should be arranged THEMATICALLY or CHRONOLOGICALLY, not article by article. Since you’ve already demonstrated that you’ve read all the articles with your annotated bibliographies, it is more important to show that you have identified the dominant arguments and themes that characterize your topic, and can arrange evidence from a number of sources into a clear and compelling narrative.

  • at least 4000-5000 words (not including bibliography)
  • 12 point, Times New Roman font with 1” margins all around, 1.5" spacing, and include page numbers
  • you may choose the referencing system you use in your paper, but BE CONSISTENT and be sure to cite throughout your paper according to the citation guidelines of the system you use

Critical components:

1. Title

2. Introduction

  • Background and overview of your topic/problem and why it’s important; orientation to the scale and scope of the issue (using statistics, vignettes; etc.)
  • Roadmap paragraph – where is this paper going (“In this paper, I argue...”)

3. Body

  • Principal themes/key threads/cohesive narrative
  • I love subheads! Dividing up the body of your lit review into principal themes under subheadings is an effective way to more clearly organize your paper, as well as your thoughts during the write-up process
  • Can include outside information/evidence (informal interviews and casual conversations, examples from your own life, etc) but sparingly, and only to further a narrative thread or argument, not as stand-alone evidence

4. Further research

  • Gaps in the literature that you’ve identified
  • New research questions that have emerged over the course of your research (at least three)

5. Conclusion

  • Clearly and succinctly outline the key themes you’ve discussed
  • Final ‘take home’ points

6. References/Bibliography

  • Using a recognized citation style (see AAA Publishing Guide on eLearning) – including all sources

Literature Review

A literature review is an integrated analysis-- not just a summary-- of scholarly writings related directly to your research question. That is, it represents the literature that provides background information on your topic and shows a correspondence between those writings and your research question.

Lit reviews can be organized in several ways depending on how you want to present the information: chronological, thematic, or methodological.

For additional help and examples, see the UWF Libraries guide for writing a Literature Review.

Buckets

As you read the literature, pay attention to the themes that emerge. 
Imagine that each theme is a bucket and every author/source can be put into a bucket.
Remember that a source can be put into more than one bucket.

Don't Do This!

Literature reviews DO NOT just summarize each source within the paper.

Do This Instead!

Integrate your sources!

Make the connections between articles and how they relate to one another and your topic.