Skip to main content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.
UWF Libraries logo
Your opinion counts! Please give us feedback.

CGS 2920: IT Foundations

Evaluation Criteria

First things first: Find out what types of sources your instructor will allow you to use for the assignment. Some will only allow references from scholarly journals and books.

On second thought: If you are permitted to use web resources and newspaper and magazine articles in your papers and projects, you will want to evaluate the information to make sure that it is an authoritative and credible source (unless you are illustrating a point about them-- for example, showing depictions of women in the 1920s from a magazine).

Some things to consider in evaluating all types of sources*:


Currency: Is the information current and up-to-date?


Relevance: Does the information have anything to do with your topic?


Authority: Is it authoritative?


Accuracy: Is reliable and true?


Purpose: Why does the information exist?


Check the acronym.  Did your website pass the CRAAP Test?!

*Criteria adapted from the CRAAP Test, Meriam Library, California State University, Chico

 

CRAAP Test

As you evaluate scholarly articles and other pieces of information, take into consideration the currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose of the information. This will help you decide if the information is appropriate for your needs.

Why evaluate?

Critical thinking and evaluation are important because they focus on public evidence and challenge blind authority and individual bias.

Critical evaluation means careful and exact thinking. It means looking for public forms of evidence rather than simply accepting what we are told or our own biased intuitions.