Skip to main content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.
UWF Libraries logo
Your opinion counts! Please give us feedback.

Boost Your Scholarly Profile: Task 5

This guide is designed to help UWF faculty members raise their scholarly profile.

Identify Open Access publishing opportunities

Open access (OA) literature is a method of sharing scholarship that is digital, online, free of charge, and free of most copyright and licensing restrictions. What makes OA possible is the internet and the consent of the author or copyright-holder.  OA is entirely compatible with peer review, and all the major OA initiatives for scientific and scholarly literature insist on its importance. Just as authors of journal articles donate their labor, so do most journal editors and referees participating in peer review.  OA literature is not free to produce, even if it is less expensive to produce than conventionally published literature."

--From Open Access Overview, by Peter Suber

Why does this task matter?

Open Access is valuable because it:

  • removes all access barriers, providing completely free and unrestricted access to all
  • provides equitable distribution of information world-wide, regardless of social or economic status
  • provides immediate availability of research output
  • increases visibility and impact of research
  • increases usage of research results and leads to more citations
  • enhances reputation of authors and institutions
  • provides a platform for compliance with funder requirements
  • attracts potential collaborators
  • offers libraries a more financially attractive alternative to the traditional journal subscription model, where costs have increased significantly faster than the rate of inflation

Quality Indicators

Open Access publishing is not without faults. Some publishers that charge authors for submissions may use questionable publishing practices, such as slack or non-existent peer review, or only publishing for the sake of profit.

Note that there is no single criterion that indicates whether or not a publication is reputable. Rather, look for a cumulative effect of more positives or more negatives.

Positive Indicators:

  • Scope of the journal is well-defined and clearly stated
  • Journal’s primary audience is researchers/practitioners
  • Editor, editorial board are recognized experts in the field
  • Journal is affiliated with or sponsored by an established scholarly society or academic institution
  • Articles are within the scope of the journal and meet the standards of the discipline
  • Journal provides a clearly written peer-review process
  • Any fees or charges for publishing in the journal are easily found on the journal web site and clearly explained
  • Articles have DOIs (Digital Object Identifier, e.g., doi:10.1111/j.1742-9544.2011.00054.x)
  • Journal clearly indicates rights for use and re-use of content at article level (e.g., Creative Commons CC BY license)
  • Journal has an ISSN (International Standard Serial Number, e.g., 1234-5678)
  • Journal is listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals
  • Publisher is a member of Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association
  • Journal is included in Ulrichs Global Serials Directory
  • Journal is included in major academic databases and/or indexes

Negative Indicators:

  • Journal web site is difficult to locate or identify
  • Publisher “About” information is absent on the journal’s web site
  • Publisher direct marketing (i.e., spamming) or other advertising is obtrusive
  • Instructions to authors information is not available
  • Information on peer review and copyright is absent or unclear on the journal web site
  • Journal scope statement is absent or extremely vague
  • No information is provided about the publisher, or the information provided does not clearly indicate a relationship to a mission to disseminate research content
  • Repeat lead authors in same issue
  • Publisher has a negative reputation (e.g., documented examples in Chronicle of Higher Education, list-servs, etc.)

Credit:  Largely adapted from Grand Valley State University Open Access Journal Quality Indicators

Steps to complete the task

To identify OA journals in your discipline, browse the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) by subject

To evaluate a specific OA journal:

Predatory Publishers

If you've investigated publishing in an Open Access journal, you may have heard of questionable or "predatory" journals or publishers. These publishers, while certainly not exclusive to OA journals, tend to target authors seeking to publish in OA journals or may contact authors directly asking for manuscripts. They exist exclusively to gain profit. Frequently, these publishers do not initially mention any author fees, but may later ask for a publication fee under the guise of operating as a quality OA journal.

Closely examine the editor, staff, and publisher of the journal:

  • Is a single editor responsible for a large number of journals across a publisher?
  • Is there a lack of information or diversity on the editorial or review board?
  • Does the publisher fail to list transparent policies and fees?
  • Did the publisher's operations begin with a large fleet of quickly created journals?
  • Is the contact information for the publisher, editors, or review board difficult to find or not present?
  • Is the journal title misleading, or does it list a false impact factor or other quality-determining metrics?
  • Does the journal send spam requests for manuscripts or peer reviews to scholars not qualified to write on or review the subject in question?
  • Are previously published articles low quality or re-published without proper permissions from other journals?

Additional Resources: